Sociological Perspective
Why are we here, what is life all about? Is God really real, or is there some doubt? Well tonight we’re going to sort it all out, For tonight it’s the Meaning of Life.
What’s the point of all these hoax? Is it the chicken and egg time, are we all just yolks? Or perhaps, we’re just one of God’s little jokes, Well ca c’est the Meaning of Life.
Is life just a game where we make up the rules While we’re searching for something to say Or are we just simple spiralling coils Of self-replicating DNA?
What is life? What is our fate? Is there Heaven and Hell? Do we reincarnate? Is mankind evolving or is it too late? Well tonight here’s the Meaning of Life.
Consider these questions below:
- What is religion? How would you define the term?
- What is religion’s function?
- What are the elements of religion?
- The Ultimate Questions
Scientific Method
Theories are explanations that describe the relationships between groups of concepts and how and why they are related. Concepts are mental constructs of some aspect of reality. They can be measured empirically by a number of indicators. Theories help shape some testable statements, or hypotheses, we can make about reality. Theories must be able to predict observable outcomes in social life.
Sociology and Religion
One of the major tasks of sociology understands the dynamics of group life. Another is making sense of the interaction between the group and individuals.
Some key assumptions in sociology regarding human nature are that we are biological organisms, we can symbolize, and that “People become human only in groups…” Furthermore, we argue that human action is directed toward problem solving. Finally, we accept the notion that all social phenomena are interrelated.
The sociological analysis of religion requires us to rely on the scientific method. We go about this process by obtaining empirical data and using that data to verify theories. We must be able to document and replicate findings.
When reflecting on the idea of objectivity, consider this quote from J. Milton Yinger, “How is it possible to see a stained-glass window from the outside?” or another quote from an unknown source, “A fish does not see the water it swims in.” Is it possible to be objective? I think the best we can do is to recognize our biases and attempt to control for them in our research.
Definitions
One type of definition of religion of religion defines religion by what is does or by its functions. For example how does religion help people cope with life? Religious activities do increase during times of suffering and great uncertainty (ex. New Madrid Earthquakes of 1811-12). Religion gives many people meaning and purpose and it often provides a framework for their identity. According to Clifford Geertz (1966:4), “Religion tunes human actions to an envisaged cosmic order and projects images of cosmic order onto the plane of human experience.”
There is another type of definition based on what religion is, or substantive definition. These definitions describe the nature and character of the religious experience.
Examples of functional definitions of religion
- “Religion is that set of symbolic forms and acts which relates man to the ultimate conditions of his existence” Robert Bellah.
- “Religion is a system of beliefs and practices by means of which a group of people struggles with the ultimate problems of life”J. Milton Yinger
- “Religion” is “a system of beliefs and practices by which a group of people interpets and responds to what they feel is sacred and , usually supernatural as well (Johnstone, 2004:13).”Ronald Johnstone
Examples of substantive definitions of religion
- Religion as a mystical experience.* William James wrote that religion involves “the feelings, acts, and experiences of individual men in their solitude, so far as they apprehend themselves to stand in relation to whatever they may consider the divine.” In Breakfast at Victory, author James Carse (1994:24) wrote that “For Taoist as for Buddhists and Suffis, everything is underway, in motion, passing, impermanent, samsaric.”
- Rudolf Otto argued that religion is an encounter with the “numinous” (the mysterium tremendum, the holy(see Nihian Smart)). The word numinous means awe inspiring. More will be said about this in Ch.3.
Normantive/Phenomological Perspectives
The focus of the normative/personal faith perspective is on whether religion is true, right, produces good results. The phenomenological approach describes religion in terms of someone’s experience of it; what it means to them; how they believe it is affecting their life.
Yet another way to analyze…
To complicate matters further, Joachim Wach argued that religion can be expressed in three ways: 1) Theoretical (beliefs, teachings, creeds, sacred scriptures, etc.) 2) Practical (worship, ritual, pilgrimage, ceremonies), and 3) Sociological (organizational structure, people (their various characteristics), cultural context, etc.)
Where does Religion Come From?
There are many possible sources of religion such as personal crises associated with death, identity, suffering, etc. Perhaps it originates through encounters of a deep mystical sort such as in nature, visions, dreams, voices. For many, you are born or socialized into into a faith (acculturation).
The Characteristics of Religion
Religions share a number of characteristics such as some concept of sacredness, that religion is a group activity that perform certain functions, is based on beliefs, and possesses ritualized activities.
Sacredness
One common characteristic shared by most religions is a division between the supernatural/deity/sacred and the natural/mortal/mundane. The concepts of the “sacred” interested early sociologists such as Emile Durkheim. To Rudolph Otto, the “holy” important and to Mircea Eliade, it was “sacred space.”
Group Phenomena
Another characteristic of religion is that it is a group phenomena that usually involves two or more people who interact and share common goals and norms.
Functions
Religions perform a set of functions within society. It provides a normative framework that guides members to act accordingly within status system. It provides a cohesion by fostering a sense of identification with the group.
Myths
Religions are based on a body of beliefs (myths). These beliefs shape a number of things such as values, what members deem as real (criteria for validity), logic, perspective, prescriptions and proscriptions and means to reach goals. In my old undergraduate anthropology notes I found this interesting quote about what myths are. “Myths are narratives that symbolically encode culturally meaningful messages.” These myths are recounted as fact about Supernatural beings or events that happened in some unspecified time known as mythic time. Myths sometimes function as charters (validations to engage in a particular activities). They set forth the basic beliefs or values that underlie the social system in a particular society such as G. Washington felling a cherry tree. There are also origin myths (ex. fire) and creation myths.
Rituals
All religions possess a set of Practices (rituals) or what Geertz (1966) termed as consecrated behavior. Or to Glock and Stark (1964) it was the “Fusion of ethos and worldview.” Singer (1955) saw rituals as cultural performances.

Several guidelines for your research
You are there to learn and to understand rather than proselytizing or set people right. Are you able to recognize the difference between facts and opinions? Be reflexive about your perspectives and bias. Attempt gain an understanding of the worldview and experiences of others. In your research, make a clear separation between your description and interpretation
As concluding historical note, consider that religion is pervasive and diverse. Furthermore, the sociological study of religion has a long history. Durkheim, Marx, Weber, Simmel, and Stark are just the tip of the iceberg.
*See The Varieties of Religious Experience (1902): Ineffability, Noetic Quality, Transiency, and Passivity.
WEBSITES
Miller, Timothy.2003. “Religious Movements in the United States:An Informal Introduction”
SOURCES
Alighieri, Dante. 1954. The Divine Comedy. New York: Rinehart & Co., Inc.
Carse, James P. 1994. Breakfast at the Victory: The Mysticism of Ordinary Experience. 1st ed. San Francisco, Calif.: HarperSanFrancisco.
Geertz, Clifford. 1966. Person, Time, and Conduct in Bali: An Essay in Cultural Analysis. New Haven: Southeast Asia Studies, Yale University.
Gilliam, Terry, and Terry Jones. 2005. Monty Python’s The Meaning of Life. Universal Studios Home Entertainment.
Henig, Robin Marantz. 2007. “Darwin’s God.” The New York Times Magazine, March, 36-43, 58, 62, 77-78, 85.
James, William. 1990. The Varieties of Religious Experience. 1st ed. New York: Vintage Books/Library of America.
Johnstone, Ronald L. 2007. Religion in Society: A Sociology of Religion. 8th ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson/Prentice Hall.
Kurtz, Lester R. 2007. Gods in the Global Village: The World’s Religions in Sociological Perspective. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Pine Forge Press.
Lienhardt, R. G. 1961. Divinity and Experience; the Religion of the Dinka. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Staff. 1891. “Sociology and the Church.” The Nation, August, 114-115.
Dr. Kersen,
My results of the Belief-O-Matic Quiz is as follows:
1. 100% Orthodox Quaker
2. 97% Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant
3. 89% Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons)
I was surprise to be considered an Orthodox Quaker. I guess I can live with the results being that religion is a social phenomena. Although, I understand that some of all religion has some similar beliefs when it comes to religion.
My knowledge on U. S. Religion was a failure at 60%…Hopefully, when this class is over I will have a better perspective, knowledge and an understanding on different religions.
Based on the Belief-O-Matic Quiz, my top 3 faith match profiles are:
1. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (100%)
2. Orthodox Quaker (86%)
3. Eastern Orthodox (84%)
I wasn’t surprised by the results of the quiz (from my perspective) because I do consider myself a Conservative Christian. However, I didn’t like that the only options to the questions were agree, disagree, or not relevant. I would have liked an opportunity to further discuss my thought process on some of the questions. (I also find that I’m very interested in the question that determined where Ms. Griffin’s – previous post – and my quizzes differed.)
I scored a 100% on the U.S. Religion quiz. Somewhere along the way I picked up just enough knowledge to answer each question correctly (as per Pew Research anyway). Having a week to “chew the fat” has allowed me time to recognize the opportunity to learn more about religion, its effect on society, and society’s effect on religion – and all the “crazy” people in between (present company not excluded).
Looking forward to an exciting, and interesting, four months!
Dr. Kersen,
My top three faith matches based on the quiz are:
1. Seventh Day Adventist (100%)
2. Orthodox Quaker (95%)
3. Mainline to Conservative Chritstian Protestant
WOW!!! I could not belive these results. Although I know a little about Seventh Day Adventist, I would see myself as one. The other two I have no clue about, but I hope to learn about these and many other religions through this course.
Top three faith matches are:
1) Mainline to Liberal Christian Protestant (100%)
2) Unitarian Universalism (96%)
3) Liberal Quakers (92%)
Like others that posted their top three faith matches, I too am a bit shocked at the results. I was raised in a conservative christian home so my top match is really no surprise, but the second and third I did not even know existed. I guess that shows how much I need to learn!
I scored 80% on the U.S. religion quiz. Somehow, I was certain I knew more than that, but again, surprise! I think it is fascinating how I, and I am sure many others, have gone through most of life not questioning what we were taught or critically thinking about these beliefs. I look forward to being exposed to new and exciting religions and religious groups each week!
Hey Team,
My 3 religious categories were 1-Sikhism, 2- Jainism, 3- Baha’s Faith…furthermore I received a 14/15 on the other religion associated quiz. I think that because I recognize the ability of man to manipulate religion through “translation” causes me to view religion as a system rather than a way of life, which I would codify as “belief”/ “faith”. Should make for an interesting class tonight!
I really enjoyed our conversation together! Keep on truckin’ and I hope you have a wonderful weekend!
Hi, everyone,
my top three are:
1. Neo-Pagan (100%)
2. Unitarian Universalism (89%)
3. Mahayana Buddhism (86%)
I am surprised by this results. I thought that I might be Buddhism without any doubt. But when I found this explanation “Neo-Pagan is an umbrella term for various and diverse beliefs with many elements in common” I start to believe it. I was a pure Buddhist, eat vegetable, no meat, no killing, and read Buddhist sutras. But I also agree with some statement in Bible. And I believe the material things have spiritual meanings. I think my diverse beliefs made me to be Neo-Pagan and Unitarian Universalism. Maybe just because I am on my way seeking my faith.
The follow-up question, a reflective one, I might add, is what does this mean to you, now that you know a little more about yourself?
I think this results do have some meanings to me. It made me start think about other possibilities of my faith. And it also made me consider my worldview and ideology. From this I heard some new religions I never heard of, so that I have so much interesting and motivation to know and understand as much as I can of these religions. Also I want to see how these religions influence me and if I can accept or not. Since now I’m living in a Christian country, I want to see if this situation or environment could be a impact factor or not. Maybe I will be still on my way seeking my faith but I already have some directions.
My belief-o-matic results indicated that I am 100% Orthodox Quaker. Until now, I had no idea who or what that was. However; I took the time to read about it, since it says that’s who I am, and I found that their beliefs are very similar to my own. I believe religion should provide a roadmap for living and also teach standards or morals for individuals in society. Each time I visited a restaurant this week I was extra kind to the waitress as I reflected on Dr. Kersen’s commits in class on how individuals (customers) were particularly difficult to deal with after leaving church services on Sunday mornings. WOW! It made me think of Ghandi who stated that he liked Christ, but I do not like your Christians, because your Christians are so unlike your Christ. More often than not people do not model their religious teachings. The truth of the matter is, If I were not born into faith and had to decide as an adult, I would have a difficult time selecting a religion, because what you are taught in your faith is not always what you witness in society. I believe this also has a negative impact on society.
The results from my quiz categoried me as : 1) Mainline Liberal Protestant (100 %), 2) Liberal Quaker (80%), and Jehovah’s Witness (80%). I was not suprised by the first result however the other two were a suprise. I made a 73% (11 out of 15) on the religious knowledge quiz as well. For me, both exercises served as a moment to reflect on what I had been taught (and what I retained) from church. I want to learn more about other religious practices not only for professional knowledge but for personal knowledge as well. I had never really considered religion to be class-based, or even various perspective presented in the readings. The reading and the class discussions thus far have challenged me to re-examine my own religious beliefs (the ones that I was raised with). Additionally, the materials thus far have opened my eyes to how much I do not know about religion (including my own) and from that I plan to learn more that I will be able to apply to my personal life as well.
Brenda Baker
1. Mainline to Conservative Christian/Protestant (100%)
2. Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints (Mormons) (97%)
3. Jehovah’s Witness (97%)
I was very shocked to see Jehovah’s Witness on my results. I really thought there beliefs was much different. I am very interested in this class but I know there will be many disagreements.